PEZA vs BOI is one of the first strategic decisions a foreign company faces when expanding into the Philippines. Both agencies grant generous tax incentives. Both sit under the Department of Trade and Industry. Yet they are built for fundamentally different business models and choosing the wrong one can mean lost incentives or a costly restructuring.
The most important thing to understand in 2026: thanks to recent tax reform, the two agencies no longer differ much on what incentives they grant. They differ on who qualifies and how you must operate.
Neither PEZA nor BOI is universally better. PEZA suits export-oriented businesses willing to locate inside an economic zone; BOI suits domestic-market or location-flexible businesses in priority sectors. Since the CREATE MORE Act, both grant the same core incentive menu so the PEZA vs BOI decision now turns on your export ratio, location, and customs needs, not on who offers bigger tax breaks.
At a glance
| Factor | PEZA | BOI |
| Best for | Export enterprises (≥70% export) | Domestic-market & priority activities |
| Location | Must be inside a PEZA economic zone | Anywhere in the Philippines |
| Qualifies via | Locating in an ecozone + export activity | Activity on the Strategic Investment Priority Plan |
| Local-market sales | Restricted | Permitted |
| Incentive menu | Same (harmonized under CREATE MORE) | Same (harmonized under CREATE MORE) |
Background: what PEZA and BOI actually are
Both PEZA and BOI are Investment Promotion Agencies (IPAs): government bodies authorized to grant tax incentives to qualified businesses. The Philippines has 19 IPAs, but these two handle the bulk of foreign investment.
PEZA: the Philippine Economic Zone Authority – promotes export-oriented manufacturing and services located inside designated economic zones (ecozones) and IT parks. In 2024, PEZA locator exports reached roughly US$58.7 billion, underscoring its export focus.
BOI: the Board of Investments – promotes investment in priority activities listed on the government’s Strategic Investment Priority Plan (SIPP). Its defining feature is flexibility: a BOI-registered business can operate anywhere in the country.
Both agencies are attached to the Department of Trade and Industry, and both register qualifying companies as a Registered Business Enterprise (RBE). That shared status matters, because it is the RBE classification – not the agency name – that now determines the tax incentives a company can claim.
The key point for any PEZA vs BOI analysis: both agencies now draw incentives from the same legal framework – the CREATE Act of 2021, substantially upgraded by the CREATE MORE Act in 2024. Understanding that shared foundation is the first step to choosing correctly between them.
Why the incentives are now (mostly) the same
For years, conventional wisdom held that PEZA offered richer tax breaks. That is no longer accurate. The CREATE MORE Act (Republic Act No. 12066), in force since November 2024, harmonized the incentive menu across all IPAs.
A Registered Business Enterprise (RBE) under either agency can now access the same core package:
| Incentive | What it provides |
| Income Tax Holiday (ITH) | 0% income tax for 4–7 years (by location and industry tier) |
| Special Corporate Income Tax (SCIT) | 5% on gross income, in lieu of all national and local taxes |
| Enhanced Deductions Regime (EDR) | 20% corporate income tax plus extra deductions |
| Duty exemption | On imported capital equipment, raw materials, and spare parts |
| VAT | Zero-rating on local purchases + VAT exemption on imports (for exporters) |
| RBE Local Tax | Up to 2% of gross income, in lieu of all local taxes (during ITH or EDR) |
The CREATE MORE Act also made the package materially more attractive:
- RBEs can now choose SCIT or EDR from day one, skipping the Income Tax Holiday if that suits them better.
- Incentive duration was extended from a 10-year cap to up to 17 years (IPA-approved) or 27 years (FIRB-approved).
- The EDR corporate income tax rate dropped to 20%, and the deduction on power expenses doubled to 100%.
The practical result: for two identical projects, PEZA and BOI will usually deliver a comparable tax outcome. The decision has shifted from “which gives more” to “which fits how I operate.”
For foreign investors, this is a meaningful simplification. Earlier, the PEZA vs BOI choice carried real risk of leaving tax savings on the table. Today the Special Corporate Income Tax and Enhanced Deductions Regime are available under both agencies on the same terms, so the financial stakes of the decision are lower – and the structural fit of the agency to the business becomes the deciding factor.
PEZA vs BOI: the real differences
If the incentives are similar, what actually separates them? Four structural factors decide most cases.
| Factor | PEZA | BOI |
| Export requirement | Typically ≥70% of output exported | None domestic sales fully allowed |
| Location | Inside a PEZA economic zone or IT park | Anywhere in the Philippines |
| Eligibility basis | Locating in an ecozone + export activity | Activity listed on the SIPP |
| Customs & logistics | Integrated customs, streamlined import/export | Standard customs procedures |
Location and the zone requirement
This is the single biggest divider. A PEZA-registered enterprise must operate inside an accredited economic zone, which brings on-site customs, one-stop government services, and faster import/export processing, but limits where you can locate.
A BOI-registered enterprise has no such constraint. It can be set up anywhere, which matters for businesses that need to be near domestic customers, specific labour pools, or existing facilities.
Export orientation versus domestic market
PEZA is engineered for export enterprises. Fall below the export threshold and you risk incentive clawback. BOI comfortably accommodates a domestic market enterprise selling locally – including distribution, retail, and e-commerce – provided the activity appears on the SIPP.
In short, the PEZA vs BOI comparison reduces to two questions: where will you sell, and where can you locate? Answer those honestly and the right agency usually becomes obvious.

When PEZA is the better choice
Choose PEZA when your model is export-led and zone-based. The agency’s design rewards companies that ship most of their output abroad and benefit from clustering inside a managed zone. It tends to be the stronger fit if:
- You export 70% or more of your goods or services.
- You run export manufacturing, IT-BPO, or regional supply-chain operations.
- You import frequently and value integrated customs and streamlined logistics.
- You are comfortable locating inside a designated economic zone or IT park.
For an exporter, the combination of zone infrastructure, VAT zero-rating on local purchases, and on-site one-stop services often outweighs the location constraint.
When BOI is the better choice
Choose BOI when flexibility and domestic access matter more than zone benefits. Because it imposes no location constraint, BOI is often the default for companies that need to be close to their customers or supply base. It is usually the better fit if:
- You sell substantially to the domestic market – retail, distribution, or e-commerce.
- Your activity appears on the Strategic Investment Priority Plan.
- You need to locate outside an economic zone, near customers or specific resources.
- You want simpler site selection without the ecozone footprint.
A useful real-world pattern: a technology firm expecting only ~60% export revenue would fail PEZA‘s threshold. Registering with BOI preserves local flexibility while still securing tax holidays, a reminder to structure around your business model, not the largest headline incentive.
Hybrid and dual structures
The PEZA vs BOI question is not always either-or. Larger investors sometimes register two entities one PEZA-registered for export operations and one BOI-registered for domestic functions to match each activity to the right regime.
This adds compliance overhead and requires careful transfer-pricing discipline, but for businesses straddling export and domestic markets it can capture the best of both. It is a structuring decision best taken with professional advice rather than as a default.
The trade-off is real: two registrations mean two sets of reporting obligations and clear separation of activities between the entities. For many mid-sized investors a single registration is simpler and sufficient, and the hybrid model earns its complexity only when export and domestic revenues are both substantial.
Limitations and considerations
A few honest qualifications apply to any PEZA vs BOI decision:
- The framework is still settling. The CREATE MORE Act IRR was signed only in February 2025, and administrative guidance continues to evolve. Verify the current position before filing.
- Incentive duration and tiers depend on location and industry. The 4–7 year ITH and the 17- or 27-year cap are ranges, not fixed entitlements; the actual grant depends on your project’s classification.
- Large projects are approved differently. Incentives for projects above PHP 15 billion are approved by the Fiscal Incentives Review Board (FIRB), not the IPA alone.
- Eligibility is activity-specific. Whether your business qualifies and under which agency depends on the SIPP and your export ratio, which can require professional interpretation.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What is the main difference between PEZA and BOI?
PEZA requires you to operate inside an economic zone and is built for export enterprises (typically ≥70% export). BOI lets you operate anywhere and suits domestic-market businesses in priority sectors. Both grant similar incentives under the CREATE MORE Act.
2. Is PEZA or BOI better for tax incentives?
Neither is clearly better since the CREATE MORE Act harmonized incentives. Both offer the Income Tax Holiday, 5% SCIT, and the Enhanced Deductions Regime. The PEZA vs BOI choice should turn on your export ratio and location needs, not on incentive size.
3. Does a foreign investor need to export to register with PEZA?
Generally yes. PEZA is designed for export enterprises, usually requiring around 70% of output to be exported. A business serving mainly the local market will typically register with BOI instead.
4. Can a BOI-registered company operate anywhere in the Philippines?
Yes. Unlike PEZA, BOI imposes no economic-zone requirement, so a BOI-registered enterprise can locate anywhere provided its activity is on the Strategic Investment Priority Plan.
5. What did the CREATE MORE Act change for PEZA and BOI investors?
The CREATE MORE Act (RA 12066) cut the EDR corporate income tax rate to 20%, let RBEs choose SCIT or EDR from day one, and extended incentive duration to up to 17 or 27 years. These apply across both PEZA and BOI.
6. Can a company register with both PEZA and BOI?
Not for the same activity, but a group can set up separate PEZA and BOI entities for export and domestic functions respectively. This hybrid approach adds compliance work and should be structured with professional guidance.
Key Takeaways
- The PEZA vs BOI decision is no longer about who gives bigger incentives – the CREATE MORE Act harmonized the menu across both.
- PEZA is built for export enterprises that are located inside an economic zone; BOI suits domestic-market businesses that need to operate anywhere.
- Both agencies grant the Income Tax Holiday, 5% SCIT, and Enhanced Deductions Regime – now for up to 17 or 27 years under CREATE MORE.
- BOI eligibility depends on the Strategic Investment Priority Plan; PEZA eligibility depends on ecozone location and export ratio.
- Hybrid PEZA-plus-BOI structures exist for businesses straddling export and domestic markets, but add compliance complexity.
Conclusion
For foreign investors expanding into the Philippines, the PEZA vs BOI choice has become cleaner and, in one sense, lower-stakes: under the CREATE MORE Act, the incentive packages now converge, so a wrong guess no longer means leaving large tax savings on the table. What remains is a structural question: export or domestic, zone-based or location-flexible.
Decide by mapping your business model first: your export ratio, where you need to operate, and how your activity is classified under the Strategic Investment Priority Plan. Match those facts to the right agency, confirm the current rules with a qualified adviser, and the PEZA vs BOI decision resolves itself.








